Why fans are so worried about Pacific Rim's box office fortunes

When  a report appeared online that mentioned, in an offhand manner, that more people wanted to see Grown Ups 2  than Pacific Rim two weeks before both movies' release, there were a number of interesting takeaways.

Firstly, that a surprising large number of people were excited about the prospect of a sequel to a critically panned movie starring both Kevin James and Adam Sandler. Secondly, that despite the sizable amount of pre-release promotion -- including  multiple trailers and online featurettes -- a surprisingly small number of people were excited about the sci-fi action movie Pacific Rim. It's an unfortunate, but simple fact of the movie industry: sometimes, good movies flop, and crappy movies succeed. (Let's call it the Speed Racer/Smurfs rule.)

Except, it turned out, there was a third school of thought that went beyond happenstance. What if, some fans and pundits wondered, the reason that people aren't that excited about Pacific Rim was because of a conspiracy against the movie?  "Who is trying to kill Pacific Rim?" wondered one report. After all, there was simply no other reason that audiences wouldn't want to see a movie about giant robots beating up giant lizards that's filled to the brim with easter eggs referencing things that they've never even heard about, never mind seen.

After all, you just have to look at the stratospheric success of Marvel's The Avengers, The Dark Knight, Iron Man 3 or Man of Steel to know that, on some level, we're all geeks now, at least when it comes to the multiplex. The mainstream has been so successfully colonised by comic book culture, and its attendant sub-cultures, that the idea that something so squarely appealing to one of those sub-cultures -- namely, Kaiju Japanese Monster fandom -- felt almost guaranteed to be a hit in some way. Those nerds love that kind of stuff, right?
But therein lies the disconnect. Kaijus aren't superheroes. There's a (sizable) crossover in their fan bases, yes; both genres enjoy a focus on larger-than-life storytelling and melodramatic stakes, but that crossover isn't absolute. For all of the ridiculous and impossible things that superheroes can do, their stories tend to focus on relatable characters. Monster stories, on the other hand, tend to be… well, about destruction and spectacle. Bearing that in mind, it's hardly surprising that mainstream (i.e., not traditionally "nerdy") audiences are sceptical about whether or not Pacific Rim is really for them, since its appeal is based on nostalgia for things they haven't necessarily experienced or embraced.

But this fan protectiveness -- this desire for the movie's success -- has also inspired very defensive reactions. As of time of writing, tweets announcing that "If you're not excited to see Pacific Rim, then we can't be friends" are all over Twitter from multiple people; all tongue in cheek, of course, but there's a weird peer pressure involved in their popularity nonetheless (Related:  the sudden spate of celebrity endorsements).
Worse, when some reviews paused between complimenting the special effects and awesome action sequences to comment that the movie is light on character moments, fan reaction was oddly aggressive: "If you're disappointed that Pacific Rim isn't the great character drama of our generation you deserve to be punched in the face on entry,"  went one tweet, for example, responding to a straw man argument that no one had actually made. It's almost as if Pacific Rim's success or lack thereof was personal for a lot of people who have no actual connection with the movie.

Movie critic Scott Weinberg has a theory about that. "Here's why geeks care if Pacific Rim makes money," he  tweeted last weekend. "Because we love Guillermo del Toro and we want him to succeed. It's not brain surgery."

Is it really that simple? Has del Toro amassed enough goodwill directing movies like Blade II, Pan's Labyrinth and the Hellboy movies -- and failing, publicly, to direct movies like  At the Mountains of Madness -- that he's been accepted by the great unspoken nerd hive mind, and deemed worthy of the oddly aggressive-defensive "One of Us" attitude that trumps whether or not a project is actually any good or not? Somewhere, Joss Whedon is smiling, having gone through the same thing with both Dollhouse and Serenity.
Ultimately, such an attitude does everyone involved a disservice. In Pacific Rim, del Toro has created a love letter to a genre with a relatively small fanbase; instead of getting petulant or angry that the mainstream audience might instinctively recognise his genius without context -- or simply might not be into it -- it strikes me that the thing to do for those who love del Toro is to congratulate him for a job well done, commiserate with him for those who passed up the chance to join in, and move on.

If Pacific Rim doesn't conquer the box office this weekend-and  current tracking suggests that even Kanye West's approval hasn't really shifted that possibility that much-then it can join things like 2001, Fight Club and Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World as beloved films that flopped at the box office. Console yourself with the fact that it's unlikely to lose as much money as Lone Ranger or John Carter.

HTC One vs Galaxy S4 vs Xperia Z: a superphone group test

In the battle of the Androids, bigger is better, and price considerations come behind the need to have the best there is. We put the three latest contenders to the test. 

HTC One

HTC

HTC has always made a virtue of build quality and the One makes the most of that heritage. It's a little smaller than the others, making it a bit more pocket-friendly, but it's distinguished by its metal unibody casing which is the equal of the iPhone 5 for class and heavy duty build.

Its display offers an HD resolution of 1,920x1,080p -- the same as its two rivals in this test, but with its slightly smaller screen measuring 4.7 inches it's arguably a little bit sharper, delivering an eyeball-piercing (not literally) 468ppi. That detail is pretty much all in the spec however, since side-by-side they look just as good as each other.
The quad-core 1.7GHz processor is certainly fast, and it needs to be to cope with HTC's busy Sense interface. It looks lovely with some nice, smooth animations, and extra widgets include BlinkFeed, which offers a Flipboard-type service that pulls together your favourite media and social networking updates into a magazine-style interface. The problem is you can only use the news feeds that HTC has approved and it doesn't really offer any improvements on Flipboard, which is available for free from Google Play. The other problem is that you can't turn it off.


The four-megapixel camera marks a departure from the norm. With other camphones upping the megapixel count HTC has pointed out that picture quality isn't necessarily dependent on the number of pixels, and instead made great play of its large F2.0 aperture and 28mm lens. The idea is that less, but bigger, "Ultrapixels" on a larger sensor will let in more light and so result in better pictures.
It's a good effort by HTC, which has been plagued by concerns about its relatively low-quality cameras over the years, but in terms of sharpness, vibrancy and detail, it suffers in comparison with both the Xperia Z and the Galaxy S4.
As with all of our superphones, battery life is the problem that recurs again and again. While none are likely to deliver much more than a day of standard use, the HTC One's is the smallest, and lags just a little behind its peers.


HTC has been incorporating a very basic version of the Beats Audio processing technology and headphones into its handsets for a while now but the One takes it a stage further with good-sounding stereo speakers on the front, especially handy for movie watching.
It's available with 32GB or 64GB of memory on board, but with no microSD card, there's no way to augment this like you can with the other two.
Samsung Galaxy S4

 The Galaxy S4 doesn't feel quite as classy as its rivals here, despite its price (it's the most expensive in our round-up) and the wealth of tech packed into its innards. That's because Samsung has chosen to continue its use of thin plastic covers that don't feel much different to their low-spec cousins at the budget end of the market. There's method in the apparent madness, since it helps to keep the weight down (it's the lightest on test at just 130g) but that gain is also likely to be offset by the fact that many people who want the best phone also want it to look and feel like the best. If the HTC One is the Ferrari of Android smartphones, the Galaxy S4 is closer to the understated charm of a Bentley, with its operational excellence hidden beneath a relatively dowdy exterior.


The five-inch touchscreen offers a resolution of 1,920x1,080p -- the same as the Xperia Z and both screens offer 441ppi, though both are slightly behind the slightly smaller screen on the HTC One's 468ppi.
Unlike its rivals, the S4 has a physical home button beneath the screen, flanked by touch-sensitive back and multi-tasking buttons. It may be an echo of Apple's design, or it may just be something that focus groups like. Either way, it's a comforting and reliable way to get back to the beginning if you ever get confused by the bewildering range of options.

And options there are many. Samsung's TouchWiz interface is even more intrusive than HTC's Touch. It's packed with extras, including 36 preloaded apps with everything from S Health (which uses the phone's barometer and motion sensor to track your general health) to WatchON (which uses infrared tech to turn your phone into a universal remote), many of which you can add to the programmable side bar. There's an advanced range of gesture controls such as Smart Scroll, which scrolls through a page of text as you tilt the phone and Smart Pause, which pauses the video you're watching if you look away -- handy perhaps, but it doesn't always work. Air View also allows you to hover your finger over the phone to bring up extra features, like the controls when you're watching a video.
There's also the picture-in-picture feature that allows you to watch a video in the corner of the screen while you're doing something else, like checking your email or browsing the web.

 The 13-megapixel camera marks pretty much the apex of Samsung's steadily developing camera know-how. There's an impressive suite of options both pre and post-shooting, which will keep the happy snappers busy, but don't get in the way of point-and-shoot, since the automatic settings will be more than acceptable for most. Unusual modes include Eraser, which allows you to edit out unwanted moving elements in a pic, such as passers-by, and Drama takes several pictures of a moving subject and lets you combine them into a single pic with a still background. Gimmicks aside, pictures are sharp and detail-heavy and it's certainly the best camera here.

 The S4 is the only handset in our trio which was able to offer Android 4.2 Jelly Bean out of the box (the other two launched with 4.1 and promises of updates) and this should hopefully put it ahead of the queue for version 4.3 when it arrives over the summer.

Sony Xperia Z
The Xperia Z can make a claim of being the toughest of the three on test here. With toughened glass front and back it's also water and dust-resistant. It can handle total immersion in water for up to half an hour, making it the essential choice if you're likely to use it in the bath.
It's also the cheapest, and though its specs are very similar to its rivals, you should be able to pick up the Xperia Z for considerably less.


 It's also the cheapest, and though its specs are very similar to its rivals, you should be able to pick up the Xperia Z for considerably less.
On paper, the Xperia Z's processor is the least powerful here. Clocked at 1.5GHz it's behind the One's 1.7GHz and the S4's 1.9GHz, though all three are supported by a full 2GB of RAM memory. In AnTuTu benchmark it delivered the lowest score -- 18,440, behind the One's 22,420 and the S4's 25,394 but in practise though, there's really very little difference to the performance. They're all very fast phones, opening apps in a twinkling and delivering consistently smooth performance when browsing, watching HD videos and even playing HD games.

 The 13.1-megapixel easily outperforms the HTC One but in terms of quality it's very close indeed to the S4. It has an impressive range of modes and features including Sony's Exmor R sensor, designed to improve the quality of pics taken in low light, as well as touch focus, face detection and image stabilisation. It loses out to the S4 in terms of the sharpness of image (just about) and it doesn't have quite as many features, but there's not a lot in it. Like the other camphones here, it can also record 1080p video at 30fps and also like the others it has a two-megapixel front-facing camera for video calls.

As we've come to expect with high-powered smartphones, battery life isn't great and you'll struggle to get a full day's use out of it. There is however Stamina Mode, which powers down all the phone's functions when the screen goes dim. Good for the battery, but not always so good for communication, though you can customise the settings to leave certain functions on, depending on what you need doing.
Of the three user interfaces here, Sony's is the least intrusive. The shortcut icons look different to standard Android, and there are a few unique widgets, but otherwise it's pretty much the same as what Google intended.

 Comparison conclusion
The HTC One is arguably the best looking, but it lets itself down on the quality of its camera, poor battery life and lack of expandable memory. The Sony Xperia Z is the value for money choice, with specs similar to its rivals, and a tough, water and dust-resistant shell, but costing considerably less.

 The Samsung Galaxy S4 is the most expensive, despite looking the cheapest. But for the power of its processor, the mind-boggling amount of tech that it's managed to cram in, and the quality of its camera, it's the standout favourite.